HIAC used to mean something and it came around only once or twice a year. Now more then one in one night?! Same thing with TLC, I feel there ruining the matches for some cheap ratings.
BQ: Did anyone catch Lawlers blunder on raw? He said DX never competed in a HIAC match, yet they fought mchmahons.|||Yes. Hell In A Cell matches are very rare, and that's one of the things that makes them both special and exciting to watch. They don't come around very often, and when they do come around, they usually don't disappoint. The thing with HIAC Matches is that they only come around once or twice a year because they are one of the most exciting matches in the WWE and they can't be overused. Having too many HIAC matches in one night will take away the quality of the matches because each match has to be made unique and different or else the audience will not be impressed by all of the matches. When there is only one HIAC match scheduled, people look forward to it more, but now since there are several HIAC matches scheduled for the same night, the credibility of the match will be ruined.
BQ: lol. I did catch that. You'd think Lawler would know since HBK and HHH were just talking about it right before the match. It's kind of funny when the commentators botch though...:)|||i like it being suprises like when vickie put edge in a hell in a cell match against the undertaker at summerslam...CLASSIC!|||I know there only doing it for more money and matches.The WWE is going to fall at he rate there doing things from doing this to making it PG to changing PPV names.
I mean we've seen some of the greatest matches ever in HIAC and now ther just being used like a regular match now.They used to end big fueds and had great matches.Like Edge vs Undertaker.It's usually 1 HIAC a year there ruining a tradition for rating and little kids that are ruining WWE.Come on TLC was great for tag teams to like the Hadys and Edge %26amp; Christian now there being used willy nilly(Just made that up) Same with TNA but at least they have some memorial ones.
BQ:Yeah,They beat mcmahons and big show in a HIAC so what was that about Lawler.|||Yes it's just like having frequent title changes it devalues the meaning of them.
BQ: Yeah and what made even more funnier is that DX talked about beating the McMahon's in a Hell In A Cell not too long before Lawler goofed up.|||Actually there really shouldn't be so much use of the match in one night but the matches are looking awesome especially DX vs Legacy
BQ: Yeah i did notice him saying it i was surprised|||Cheap ratings is what the WWE are all about. Credible wrestlers are often put aside, so that the meatbags can flex their muscles, and get reactions from the crowd.|||I don't think so.. It is how they book these matches will matter, to determine whether or not the credibility of HIAC is ruined. Still HIAC means something. Orton-Cena rivalry will end with it, as Cena said there will be no more rematches if Orton loses. Same with DX-Legacy rivalry. Triple H said this thing(rivalry) will end at Hell in a Cell.
I feel that these kind of PPVs are a chance for the Main Eventers to perform in speciality matches, and for the fans to enjoy it.
BQ: I didn't notice, but I saw few questions here pointing that out. Blunder indeed.|||I agree completely! Hell in a Cell would be brought it when 2 superstars' rivalry is so intense it cant be put anywhere else. For example Edge and Undertaker wrestled each other for almost all of 2008 and their feud culminated in Hell in a Cell at SummerSlam. Hell in a Cell ends all feuds. They are ruining the concept of the match and they are doing it for like you said, Cheap ratings.
BQ: I went to Monday Night Football last night and I am watching a recording of RAW at the moment although after watching Cedric's entrance at the beginning of RAW it tempted me to turn it off.|||Yes, very much so
BQ they also faced Spirit Squad|||Yes because I think a hell in a cell match should remain like a special attraction and only have great memorable moments happening in them, I remember the first few hell in a cell matches they had a few years ago with HBK/Undertaker, Foley/Undertaker and Foley/HHH etc and I remember them being so good and looking forward to seeing the next one and seeing what memorable thing was going to happen in it. But they have happened so much now that I don't think people can get as excited especially when they see every match taking place in one|||yes u r right that this pppv is going 2 ruin the credibility of haic match
but mayb wwe wants 2 make haic stationed
meaning, they have stationed the elimination chamber at no way out %26amp; i thought that it is a bad idea, but it worked
%26amp; they might b thinking that fans r always eager 2 see some high rated rivalry come 2 an end in a haic match
so they have stationed it, that every year there should b 1 such event where we get 2 see the satan's structure
mayb every year they will generate such high end rivalries which need a haic demand
or mayb after this year we wont see any such ppv again %26amp; haic will get its original rareness back
then we have haic which is also a fear causing event when 2 guys r said 2 b competing in it, so mayb they have some other idea
like they will create another such match....mayb with a name "death in dungeon" or ....um...m...."solid storming"
actually i think that they should have made "punjabi prison match" stationed, that is not as deadly as haic but would b fine|||You see this is why PG Era is ruining the WWE.
They think having 3 or more hell in a cell matches will entertain kids:
The Hell In a cell concept was a bone chilling thrilling experience for superstars even if they fought the Undertaker (King of the cell)
Hell In a cell was a once a lifetime match now they are ruining it by having this PPV. Why they got rid of the No Mercy PPV I have no idea.
Main point is that PG Era had to do something with this no doubt.|||Yes,it is ruining the fantastic legacy of Hell In a Cell.
The Hell In a Cell is one of the most exciting matches in WWE, high risk, fast paced, bloody action where we always see two wrestlers pushed to their limits, The Hell In a Cell match is phenomenal, but having a whole PPV of Hell In a Cell matches is not what it's about. Hell In a Cell is only supposed to be held on very special occasions, usually to end feuds or hype them up. But having a whole PPv dedicated to HIAC obviously won't work out, we only want to see HIAC on special occasions and about once or twice per year, not 3 or 4 times a year, that is just too much, In My Opinion, there should never be a whole PPV set on one stipulation type match, It just ruins the legacy every time.
Lets take a look at some of these fantastic HIAc matches over the years.....
-Shawn Michaels Vs. Undertaker - 1997
-Undertaker %26amp; Steve Austin Vs. Kane and Mankind - 1998
-Undertaker Vs. Mankind- 1998
-Kane Vs. Mankind - 1998
-Undertaker Vs. Big Boss Man - 1999
-Triple H Vs. Cactus Jack - 2000
- Kurt Angle Vs. Undertaker Vs. Triple H Vs. Rikishi Vs. The Rock Vs. Steve Austin- 2000
-Triple H Vs. Chris Jericho - 2002
- Undertaker Vs. Brock Lesnar - 2002
-Triple H Vs. Kevin Nash- 2003
-Triple H Vs. Shawn Michaels - 2004
-Triple H Vs. Batista - 2005
-Undertaker Vs. Randy Orton - 2005
- DX Vs. The McMahons and Big Show - 2006
-Batista Vs. Undertaker -2007
-Undertaker Vs. Edge - 2008
As you can see,there is usually only one or two a year, now that we're getting 3 or 4, I'm not sure if it's really going to work out for WWE or the fans.|||Idk as yet it really depend on how the matches goes,
BQ: HHH said he's only been in 5 Cell matches, when he has been in 6....Hbk said hhh has been in more cell matches when the Undertaker has been in 9 cell matches...Lawler is begging for a heel turn, I mean really did Lawler and Jr. call that match with Big Show and The McMahon's???? woow idk they whole segment needed help|||stop crying u cry baby|||Yup, I don't know what's goin on with Vince and his writers but it seems that all they want is to change the story and sell new merchandise but in return, fans will lose interest of watching.
All I'm thinking is WWE wants to get more talents and early experience rather than focusing on few wrestlers. I hate this new PPV idea and that is why I'll stop watching for awhile.
I've heard a lot of errors before and I'm not surprised because commentators intentionally say that to get more paying customers and make the new fans believe that it never happened before.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment