Thursday, November 24, 2011

How does the Bible achieve credibility with its followers when it starts off contradicting science...?

...on the first page?





Science has a long track record of achievement demonstrated by tangible results and improvements in technology and understanding that cannot be denied. Then, the Bible comes along and on the first page, it says that God created the heavens and the earth in six days? So, why would the Bible, that offers no evidence of its claims, nor discusses its methodology for coming to such a conclusion be given credibility over science?





Bonus Question: Why shouldn't someone reading it for the first time just dismiss it out of hand after reading the first page?|||I've read 5 different bible versions, all BS.





The cult hooks of heaven and hell keep them hooked, no matter what the BS|||The Genesis Explanation


The opening words of Genesis tell us: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” (Genesis 1:1) Do these words of Genesis say that this happened about ten thousand years ago? No, it gives no time period. “The beginning” could therefore have been billions of years ago.


However, right at “the beginning,” the Bible puts an intelligent being, the Creator, in control of the creative work. Although many scientists are uncomfortable with this idea, it harmonizes with the conclusions of astronomers that the universe did have a beginning, that it is very well ordered, and that it is governed by definite laws. An orderly arrangement based on law can come only from an intelligent mind. While science has explained many of these laws to us, Genesis alone introduces us to the Lawgiver.|||Science has a long track record of achievement demonstrated by tangible results ....





the bible also, when believed and adhered to is proven by tangible results -millions testify of this .


just because you "choose" to disbeleive them does not make them liars .





To say it does would be most unscientific.|||a. People who read the bible don't believe in science


b. Many take Adam and Eve and the six days of creation to be metaphorical.


c. People arn't aware of the science and they are taught the bible first





The length of a day was created by man. Some believe in the first cause and they might think that the universe was created in 6 days and god created it knowing that humans would evolve.





There are so many different views, i think it's unhealthy and unfair to dismiss all religeous people as stupid.|||The bible is not intended as a scientific journal and therefore not credible source of scientific truth. The bible is a source of transcendent truth about eternity or a world outside of our own, and about the nature of God and His revelations which the church through the authority given by Jesus, can interpret correctly the divine truth in the bible.|||Technically, it's modern science that contradicts the Bible, rather than vice versa. The Bible was written 2000 years ago, and modern science dates back only to about the Renaissance. Religionists already had this junk pounded firmly into their heads long before people started investigating the natural world to find out how true any of it was.|||Genesis is not meant to be a taken as a literal account of world history; it is allegory.





We Jews have known this for centuries; why are you gentiles still catching onto this idea?





EDIT:





G*d did not write the Bible. It is a collection of oral traditions, consisting of legend, myth, poetry and some history, which was redacted by no less than 5 distinct authors.|||http://www.reasons.org/cosmic-design/big…|||Answer to both questions: Blind faith and mind control are powerful tools and difficult to get rid of.|||Want proof of The Bible being THE Inspired Word of God i have plenty:





Holy Bible Facts:





The Holy Bible was written over a 1500 year period of time by about 44 authors. Evidence of the Bible's inspiration also includes: Prophecy-See the following: Babylon [Isa.13:19-22] Tyre [Ezek.26:3-5] Sidon [Ezek.28:21-23, Cyrus [Isa.44:28, 45:1] Medo-Persia %26amp; Greese [Dan. 8:20-21] and Jesus' birthplace [Mic.5:2] Also Archaeology: The Moabite Stone discovered in 1868 at Dibon, Jordan, confirming the Moabite attacks on Israel as recorded in 2 Kings 1 %26amp; 3, The Lachish Letters, discovered 1932-1938, 24 miles north of Beersheba, describing the attacks of Nebuchadnezzar on Jerusalem in 586 B.C. The Dead Sea Scrolls, were discovered in 1948 They date back to 150-170 B.C. and contain all or part of The Old Testament exept for Esther. They confirm the Bible's accuracy. Chrus Cylinder Records Cyrus's overthrow of Babylon and his deliverance of The Jewish captives. The Rosetta Stone discovered in 1799, by Napoleon's scientists, was written in three languages-hieroglyphics, demotic, Greek. It unlocked the mystery of understanding hieroglyphics, demotic, and Greek. It unlocked the mystery of understanding hieoglyphics. Understanding hieoglyphics helps to confirm the authencticy of The Bible. and It does not despite claims to contadict itself. The bible is indeed The Word of God. Find out more free Bible Lessons www.vop.com|||Most branches of modern science were founded by believers in creation. Evolution does not have such a list !!!





Physics - Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Kelvin, Joule


Chemistry - Boyle, Dalton, Ramsay


Biology - Ray, Linnaeus, Mendel, Pasteur, Virchow, Agassiz


Geology - Steno, Woodward, Brewster, Buckland, Cuvier


Astronomy - Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Herschel, Maunder


Mathematics Pascal, Leibnitz, Euler





Note that we are not claiming that they all agreed on every aspect of creation; rather, they refute the common evolutionary arguments that "no creationists can be real scientists" and that "denying evolution will return us to the Dark Ages."





Even today, many scientists reject particles-to-people evolution (i.e., everything made itself).





Dr Russell Humphreys, a nuclear physicist working with Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, has had over 20 articles published in physics journals, while Dr John Baumgardner's catastrophic plate tectonics theory was reported in Nature. Dr Edward Boudreaux of the University of New Orleans has published 26 articles and four books in physical chemistry. Dr Maciej Giertych, head of the Department of Genetics at the Institute of Dendrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, has published 90 papers in scientific journals. Dr Raymond Damadian invented the lifesaving medical advance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).





the non Christian really has no logical alternative but to accept that Jesus is God:





“I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept his claim to be God.” That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic-on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg-or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse.





You can shut him up for a fool, you can spit at him and kill him as a demon; or you can fall at his feet and call him Lord and God. “





Col 2:9 (NIV)|||Because the people in the Bible were there. Scientists were not.

No comments:

Post a Comment